<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fusion-io: Can you say Super Speedy Database?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.designmind.com/blog/http:/markginnebaugh.com/blog/sql-server/fusionio-ssd/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.designmind.com/blog/sql-server/fusionio-ssd/</link>
	<description>Perspectives on business and technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 21:36:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Solid State Drives: SQL Server 2008 at the Speed of Light &#124; Ginneblog</title>
		<link>http://www.designmind.com/blog/sql-server/fusionio-ssd/comment-page-1/#comment-1183</link>
		<dc:creator>Solid State Drives: SQL Server 2008 at the Speed of Light &#124; Ginneblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 06:57:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markginnebaugh.com/blog/?p=1090#comment-1183</guid>
		<description>[...] Fusion-io is a producer of enterprise-class SSDs.  Their silicon-based storage architecture known as ioMemory applies flash memory to large-scale enterprise storage products like Storage Area Networks. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Fusion-io is a producer of enterprise-class SSDs.  Their silicon-based storage architecture known as ioMemory applies flash memory to large-scale enterprise storage products like Storage Area Networks. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mariuz</title>
		<link>http://www.designmind.com/blog/sql-server/fusionio-ssd/comment-page-1/#comment-770</link>
		<dc:creator>mariuz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 12:13:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markginnebaugh.com/blog/?p=1090#comment-770</guid>
		<description>you can check the IO performance improvements with Firebird database on FusionIO 

http://www.firebirdnews.org/?p=3381

For my realtime needs I would switch to ssd for the critical random access io (like heavy self joins)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you can check the IO performance improvements with Firebird database on FusionIO </p>
<p><a href="http://www.firebirdnews.org/?p=3381" rel="nofollow">http://www.firebirdnews.org/?p=3381</a></p>
<p>For my realtime needs I would switch to ssd for the critical random access io (like heavy self joins)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RichB</title>
		<link>http://www.designmind.com/blog/sql-server/fusionio-ssd/comment-page-1/#comment-769</link>
		<dc:creator>RichB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 11:22:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markginnebaugh.com/blog/?p=1090#comment-769</guid>
		<description>Running a large online gambling facility - have 2 dozen or so on order... rather looking forward to it :)

Tested 3 in a stripe, and they are insanely fast - 3GB/s read speeds...

Had processes that took several minutes complete in seconds, sample batches of 1000 &#039;financial transactions&#039; stress test completing in under 100ms instead of the 500ms on DAS or 700ms on SAN.

Reorganising data - stripping out archivable data from a 1.5TB database and shrinking the files to 450GB, while moving all data to new filegroups... estimated (after tests) at well over 30 hours on a 55disk R10 SAN - down to under 3 hours.

Can&#039;t say how much I am looking forward to getting this in production :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Running a large online gambling facility &#8211; have 2 dozen or so on order&#8230; rather looking forward to it <img src='http://www.designmind.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Tested 3 in a stripe, and they are insanely fast &#8211; 3GB/s read speeds&#8230;</p>
<p>Had processes that took several minutes complete in seconds, sample batches of 1000 &#8216;financial transactions&#8217; stress test completing in under 100ms instead of the 500ms on DAS or 700ms on SAN.</p>
<p>Reorganising data &#8211; stripping out archivable data from a 1.5TB database and shrinking the files to 450GB, while moving all data to new filegroups&#8230; estimated (after tests) at well over 30 hours on a 55disk R10 SAN &#8211; down to under 3 hours.</p>
<p>Can&#8217;t say how much I am looking forward to getting this in production <img src='http://www.designmind.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

